After a delay and accompanying recriminations between the second and third
votes in Panama's Legislative Assembly, a new paternity testing law was passed
by the legislature but then vetoed by President Moscoso. The measure would have
provided for DNA testing to resolve questions of paternity, required fathers
to be named on children's birth certificates and provided criminal penalties
for men who falsely deny that they are the fathers of their children or mothers
who misidentify their offspring's fathers. The crux of the controversy over
the law, which Mireya ended up calling unenforceable and unconstitutional, went
mostly unreported in the Panamanian press. The entire affair belied several
layers of power politics under the apparent incongruities that show on the surface.
Moreover, now that the world press has begun to take notice of Panamanian politicians'
systematic repression against journalists, the circumstances surrounding this
rather mundane piece of attempted legislation served to highlight the inadequacies
in the mainstream corporate media's perceptions of what constitute threats to
freedom of the press.
The paternity testing law's principal advocate was legislator Teresita Yaniz
de Arias, of the Partido Popular (formerly the Christian Democratic Party) and
the wife of party boss Ricardo Arias Calderon. Mrs. Arias hailed the legislature's
approval of the law as an important advance in Panamanian women's rights.
Arias Calderon and his party have played, or attempted to play, the zig-zag
"third force" role in Panamanian politics for decades. In the mid-60s,
they were the me-too force tailing after student leftists who demanded Panamanian
sovereignty over the former Canal Zone. In the early 70s, they were one of the
civilian political factions that a de facto accomodation with the military dictatorship,
though without much success. In the mid-80s they joined the movement for civilian
rule. In the government that came in with the 1989 US invasion, Arias Calderon
played the dual role of first vice-president and minister of government and
justice. In that role he persecuted civil servants of the old regime and members
of the Democratic Revolutionary Party (PRD) that General Torrijos had founded
and over which General Noriega had assumed control. The Christian Democrats
had a falling out with the post-invasion president, Guillermo Endara, a protege
of the late Dr. Arnulfo Arias and one of the founders of the Arnulfista Party.
Arias Calderon's party suffered a catastrophic defeat in the 1994 elections,
going from 39 seats to one in the 71-member Legislative Assembly. The Christian
Democrats made their peace with the new PRD administration, receiving in exchange
the appointment of one of their leaders, Jose Antonio Sossa, to a ten-year term
as the nation's Attorney General. By allying itself with a dissident Arnulfista
in 1999, Arias Calderon's party scored a modest comeback and took a half-dozen
assembly seats. The new Arnulfista government, headed by Dr. Arnulfo Arias's
widow Mireya Moscoso, quickly showed itself to be unusually inept and corrupt
even by Panamanian standards. After a year of that, the Christian Democrats
joined with their old enemies the PRD and a couple of other minor party deputies
to wrest control of the Legislative Assembly from a coalition loyal to Moscoso.
Arias Calderon's alliance with the PRD elicited a scornful reaction from many
erstwhile allies in the movement against the dictatorship. One was by La Prensa
cartoonist Julio Briceo, who drew a cartoon portraying Arias Calderon walking
arm-in-arm with the Grim Reaper. For that, Briceo and La Prensa's publisher
at the time were charged with criminal defamation and now face the possibility
of prison terms.
Though the Briceo case has drawn worldwide attention, in Panama it was no
shock. During Jose Antonio Sossa's tenure as Attorney General, criminal defamation
charges brought by politicians against journalists have been the norm. In many
of these cases, Sossa himself has been the complainant. Though only a few people
have actually gone to jail, people and institutions have been exhausted, enervated
and impoverished by long-running legal proceedings. It has clearly affected
news reporting.
One indicator of the prevailing climate was a recent report in El Panama America,
one of the country's six daily newspapers, about the Supreme Court's confirmation
of a lower court's order in a domestic violence case. The newspaper reported,
based upon the word of a confidential source at the court, that a Panamanian
member of the Central American Parliament had been ordered to vacate his home
and stay away from his wife after battering her. (The case file in question,
like court records and trials in Panama generally, is not open to the press
or the public.) El Panama America did not report the name of the PARLACEN deputy
involved.
Meanwhile, the differences between the executive branch and the opposition-controlled
legislature have been slowly simmering toward a constitutional crisis, with
the president slashing the assembly's budget, and the parties that run the legislature
vowing to reject the chief executive's nominees for the Supreme Court and other
important posts. Even the most ordinary good government measures have become
vulnerable to legislative stalls or presidential vetoes on the basis of the
partisan affiliations of their proponents.
Between the second and third votes on the paternity test legislation, the
Arnulfista-led pro-administration caucus stalled. Naturally, it led to allegations
that the delay was a cynical part of the power struggle between the Arnulfista
president the PRD-Partido Popular alliance that controls the legislature.
Just how cynical did it look? Consider that President Moscoso, Panama's first
female president, came to power promising to better the lot of single mothers.
Consider that one of the stars in the Arnulfista legislative caucus is San Miguelito's
Gloria Young, who founded the country's first shelter for battered women. On
one level, then, it would appear to be a matter of feminist-minded politicians
weakening their principles for the sake of political expediency.
So does that make Teresita de Arias the feminist heroine, and the Partido
Popular the champion of women's liberation? As we shall see, certain circumstances
call her party's commitment to women's rights into question, but for reasons
of corporate solidarity or political alliance, you won't notice that sub-text
to the debate in the Panamanian corporate media.
Also underlying the arguments and gaining only scant mention in the press,
there are questions of money and power revolving around Attorney General Jose
Antonio Sossa.
The new law provides that paternity testing is to be done by the Instituto
de Medicina Legal, or by a laboratory designated by that government entity.
The Instituto's director, Dr. Humberto Mas, happens to be Attorney General Sossa's
brother-in-law. Mas has held his post for many years, through governments dating
back to the dictatorship.
The presumption that family or partisan ties are likely to influence the designation
of private DNA labs lies beneath much of the trouble that the Arnulfistas and
others have with the new law. Such suspicions would be inevitable given Panamanian
political culture, in which there is an expectation of nepotism and corruption.
Moreover, Sossa has a sordid reputation for protecting corruption and organized
crime, and the predictions of bias in designating DNA labs generally name him
rather than his brother-in-law as the probable bad guy.
Mas, on the other hand, has served under both PRD and Arnulfista governments
and has achieved far less notoriety. The most frequently heard negative opinion
heard about him is that he didn't do his job very well during General Noriega's
time. The specific case most often mentioned is his ruling that an anti-dictatorship
activist who died in an Anton hotel with both of his wrists deeply slashed had
committed suicide --- it is popularly believed that with one wrist so deeply
cut, the man would not have been capable of cutting the other.
There is a litany about Sossa. It includes, among many other things:
% A string of prosecutions of journalists for criminal defamation or disrespect
that has prompted international criticism;
% Failure to investigate corrupt acts by members of the Perez Balladares administration,
for example by failing to take action when Panama's consul in New York at the
time, Francisco Iglesias, who used the consulate on the Avenue of the Americas
as a gallery to market looted Peruvian antiquities. Iglesias is wanted by the
FBI for that one, but despite applicable Panamanian laws, not by Panama's authorities;
% Failure to investigate corrupt acts by members of the Moscoso administration,
for example by not looking into the expulsion from Panama without legal procedures
by former Immigration director Erick Singares of Singares's illegal immigrant
Nicaraguan maid in the course of a pay dispute. In another case, the Supreme
Court took the unusual step of ordering Sossa to conduct a criminal investigation
after Singares defied the court's writ of habeas corpus and put a man wanted
for fraud in China onto offshore "asset protection" hustler Marc Harris's
private jet for delivery to Chinese authorities;
% Failure to cooperate when authorities in other countries have asked for
Panamanian help in investigations of financial crimes. In one case, German and
US authorities asked for help in money laundering investigations involving Marc
Harris, and not only did Sossa forbid it, he fired Panama's INTERPOL chief and
the head of the Judicial Technical Police (PTJ) and unsuccessfully tried to
have several reporters for La Prensa jailed when the matter came to public light.
In another case, members of a Peruvian congressional committee that's investigating
the alleged corrupt activities of their country's former security chief, Vladimiro
Montesinos (who after his fall briefly took refuge in Panama City, then flew
away in Marc Harris's jet) fault Panama for scant help in their probe of what
they believe was the laundering of millions of dollars in proceeds from illegal
arms deals;
% Failure to conduct a serious investigation into the sale of ship officers'
certifications by Panamanian consulates abroad, a racket that has gained international
notoriety and has harmed Panama's reputation with a world maritime industry
that is crucial to the nation's economy;
%JFailure to investigate the roles of Panamanian public officials in the smuggling
of illegal Chinese migrants into the United States, a racket for which the US
government has cancelled the visas of former President Perez Balladares, former
National Security Director Gabriel Castro and several others;
% Failure to investigate corruption in the nation's prison system, with recent
examples including the just-concluded trial of 12 inmates who were charged with
the 1998 beheadings of four fellow inmates at the Coiba penal colony (seven
were convicted, five acquitted) and the ongoing criminal defamation prosecution
of law professor Miguel Antonio Bernal for his criticism of the police in relation
to the incident, all while there has never been any serious investigation of
why one of the slain inmates, who had finished serving his sentence months before,
was still being held; and
% Repeated attempts to block investigations into the fates of activists who
disappeared under the dictatorship, including by his office's mishandling of
evidence uncovered by the Truth Commission that President Moscoso set up to
investigate the deaths.
The qualms that some legislators and observers have had about putting the
designation of DNA labs to do paternity tests into the hands of Sossa's brother-in-law,
however, have hardly been mentioned in the press or on the floor of the Legislative
Assembly. There are three important reasons why this is so.
First, if there was public corruption that went uninvestigated during the
Perez Balladares administration, most informed observers and the majority of
the Panamanian public believe that corruption is generalized throughout the
Moscoso administration. If Arnulfistas complain too much about Sossa or the
power that he holds, there is always the possibility that he could begin to
investigate certain political figures in this administration.
Second, about one-quarter of all Panamanian journalists, including the author
of this article, have criminal charges --- almost always calumnia e injuria
(criminal defamation) against a government official --- hanging over their heads.
Many reporters are intimidated, and most of those who are not must submit their
articles to editors who are.
Third and probably most important, despite the usual failure of prosecutions
against journalists, Sossa, Arias Calderon and their political allies have been
far more successful at business takeovers of media that had been critical of
them, and at getting journalists who have published unflattering stories fired.
Prosecutions of reporters, editors and cartoonists have brought on worldwide
attention from journalists and human rights groups, but corporate media like
The New York Times and groups like the Committee to Protect Journalists have
a taboo against reporting the business of the news, or complaining about how
private economic forces can and sometimes are marshalled to suppress the news.
Such scrutiny is generally seen in those quarters as an infringement on editorial
prerogatives, and the problems of corporate decisions to censor the news or
fire controversial journalists are viewed as matters best left for resolution
by market forces.
While the Christian Democratic Party was in the process of turning itself
into the Partido Popular and allying itself with its old enemy the Democratic
Revolutionary Party (PRD), it was also, along with its allies, grabbing control
over elements of Panama's press. Though it's a key aspect of the story of how
the Panamanian press has been intimidated, reportage of this political maneuver
has been taboo in the most influential of the international news media. Thus
The New York Times's coverage of the predicament in which Panamanian journalism
finds itself made less sense because it failed to mention things like:
% How El Universal's publisher and editor-in-chief, Carlos Ernesto Gonzalez
de la Lastra, was fired by the previous owner for allegedly slanting the news
toward the Christian Democrats (after Moscoso, citing said bias, cut off government
advertising); and then turned the tables by leading a group of investors who
bought the daily and restored him to his post. With Gonzalez de la Lastra back
in control, El Universal has taken a very predictable editorial stance in favor
of the PRD-former Christian Democrat alliance;
% How La Prensa, once considered the nation's "newspaper of record"
and having historically taken an editorial stance opposed to the PRD, fell into
the control of the PRD-Partido Popular alliance by way of a shareholder's revolt
led by Ricardo Alberto Arias (who served as Perez Balladares's foreign minister)
and supported by Teresita de Arias and her husband. Most of the La Prensa journalists
whom Sossa tried to jail have since been fired, and on October 1 Sossa took
a triumphal stroll through the offices of a La Prensa that no longer publishes
stories about his abuses; and
% How El Siglo, a financially troubled tabloid best known for its gory photos
of accident victims and hardcore hostility to both the PRD and the Arnulfistas,
was put even further into its economic hole by a $100,000 libel judgment in
favor of former President Perez Balladares and subsequently sold to a group
headed by Ibrahim Asvat, the former Christian Democrat chief of the National
Police. Since the takeover, all of the El Siglo journalists whom Sossa tried
to imprison have lost their jobs and the paper's editorial postion solidly supports
the PRD-Partido Popular alliance.
Add to that Perez Balladares's cousin's control of two of Panama's three commercial
television networks, RPC and Telemetro, and of Panama City's cable television
system. The opposition, which is widely expected to win the next elections in
2004, has a strong base among the nation's media.
The PRD and Partido Popular do not, however, have a lock on the press. The
Arnulfistas control Panama's smallest but oldest daily newspaper, La Estrella.
The heirs of Harmodio Arias --- elder brother of Dr. Arnulfo Arias, from whom
the Arnulfistas derive their name --- own the country's largest-selling paper,
the gory tabloid La Critica, and the more respectable daily El Panama America.
These latter two papers maintain more independence from the political parties
than do the other dailies, but when Ricardo Alberto Arias engineered the dismissal
of award-winning Peruvian editor Gustavo Gorriti from La Prensa, El Panama America's
top investigative reporter, Rafael Perez Jaramillo, was fired for breaking the
story through an Internet discussion group after his superiors had killed the
story in their newspaper. The problem was that Perez Jaramillo's boss, Francisco
Arias, is Ricardo Alberto Arias's cousin.
Therefore it has come to pass that when suspicion arises that a relatively
ordinary piece of legislation might increase the power and influence of Attorney
General Jose Antonio Sossa, Panama's mainstream news media are a lot less willing
to touch the issue than they would have been a couple of years ago.
The critical reader might well ask what these tales of political and media
business intrigue have to do with a simple piece of legislation designed to
crack down on fathers who refuse to take responsibility for their children.
After all, shouldn't Teresita de Arias and her party be given the benefit of
the doubt, and credit for standing up for the rights of women?
Well, maybe. Just how committed the Partido Popular is to the rights of women
is a complicated question, as shown by the example of El Siglo's new editor-in-chief,
one Dante Dolphy.
Dolphy, who was Arias Calderon's personal aide, murdered his wife, who worked
for El Siglo. He shot her dead during the course of an argument and was thrown
in jail for it. However, despite Panama's provision of 20-year prison terms
for such crimes, he was released after a brief incarceration.
Earlier this year, when the Christian Democrats gained control of El Siglo,
the new publisher and former National Police Chief chose Dolphy as the new editor-in-chief.
Now a murderer edits the newspaper whose staff member he blew away.
El Siglo recently had a big celebration to show off its new look. And who
made a triumphal appearance? Attorney General Jose Antonio Sossa, of course,
along with a host of other political bigwigs. Practitioners of violence against
women are socially acceptable in these rarefied circles, unlike reporters and
cartoonists with independent minds.
So much for that particular faction's commitment to women's rights - but you
won't learn about this from Panama's partisan mainstream media